This document is to help Apache developers understand what they need to do to apply the Apache License, Version 2.0 or ALv2 to Apache software, including source code, documentation, and binary distributions. It is descriptive guidance, and does not supplant or otherwise modify any of the terms within the license itself. In case of uncertainty, consult general Apache policy.
The ALv2 is this set of self-documented copyright and patent licensing terms. Anyone can use the license, not just the ASF and its projects, and can be applied by reference to the versioned license terms. An appendix to the license describes how to do this.
Note that the ASF does not use copyright assignment and that the original authors retain the copyrights for individual parts of the collective work . The method described in the appendix is only suitable for copyright owners, so the ASF uses a variation of this method.
Section 4d of the license provides for attribution notices to be included with a work in a NOTICE file, so the attribution notices remains, in some form, within any derivative works. Apache projects must include correct NOTICE documents in every distribution.
To apply the ALv2 to a new software distribution, include one copy of the license text by copying the contents of LICENSE-2.0.txt into a file called LICENSE in the top directory of your distribution. If the distribution is a jar or tar file, try to add the LICENSE file first in order to place it at the top of the archive. This covers the collective licensing for the distribution.
In addition, you must include a correct NOTICE file in the same directory as the LICENSE file.
Each original source document (code and documentation, but not the LICENSE and NOTICE files) should include a short license header at the top. If the distribution contains documents not covered by an ICLA, CCLA or Software Grant (such as third-party libraries), consult the policy guide.
If the Apache Software Foundation owns and distributes the code, then Yes. All software distributions were to be converted to the new license by March 1, 2004.
If the ASF does not own the code, the decision is up to the copyright owner. Naturally, we strongly recommend that you upgrade to the new license.
Only if you want the ASF to make a new release of that code. "Dead" branches of code do not have to be updated.
Start with the legal affairs home page.
You only need to add one full copy of the license per distribution. See the policy.
See the policy.
No. Though committers retain copyright, Apache asks that they do not add copyright statements. See the policy for more details.
You can do this, however we prefer that you call the files LICENSE and NOTICE.
Yes. See the policy for more details.